INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A disciplinary panel says Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill isn't immune from the state Supreme Court's attorney discipline process just because he's an elected statewide official.
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a complaint last month saying Indiana's high court should discipline Hill over allegations he drunkenly groped a lawmaker and three legislative staffers at a bar.
Hill opposes the complaint reaching the investigative stage, arguing in part that Indiana voters will hold him accountable.
The (Northwest Indiana) Times reports the commission's attorneys say the case should proceed, arguing that Hill is seeking "special and favorable treatment" because of his elected post no other Indiana lawyer could ever obtain.
A special prosecutor declined in October to pursue criminal charges against Hill, who's denied wrongdoing and refused calls to resign .
- Panel: Discipline case against Indiana AG should proceed
- Indiana police chief resigns amid discipline controversies
- Indiana House panel backs bill raising smoking age to 21
- Judge denies Indiana AG Hill's motion in early voting case
- Concert will proceed Thursday night without Nelly
- Indiana Senate panel backs redistricting 'baby step'
- Panel accuses Indiana attorney general of misconduct
- Indiana AG challenges settlement over immigration detentions
- Indiana panel could back eliminating state handgun licensing
- Indiana Senate panel votes against expanded cold beer sales