Federal judge rules male-only draft is unconstitutional

A federal judge who ruled the Selective Service System's men-only registration unconstitutional late Friday rejected the reasoning of a 1981 Supreme Court de...

Posted: Feb 25, 2019 12:02 PM
Updated: Feb 25, 2019 1:45 PM

A federal judge who ruled the Selective Service System's men-only registration unconstitutional late Friday rejected the reasoning of a 1981 Supreme Court decision, opting for the recent women's rights rationale of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the contemporary court.

US District Court Judge Gray Miller, based in Houston, spurned the government's argument about excluding women, based partly on their interest and readiness for combat, by declaring, 'this argument smacks of archaic and overbroad generalizations about women's preferences.'

Miller said that while 'historical restrictions on women in the military may have justified past discrimination,' men and women now have many similar roles.

'If there ever was a time to discuss the place of women in the Armed Services, that time has passed,' he wrote. Miller said the Selective Service had not shown that the male-only registration requirement was 'substantially related to Congress's objective of raising and supporting armies.'

Congress eliminated the draft in the early 1970s, but all men ages 18-25 are required by law to provide basic personal information to the Selective Service System.

The judge's decision, favoring a group known as National Coalition for Men and two men of registration age, would have no immediate effect. It did not block the government's current policy. Any appeal by the agency would go to the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals before it would reach the Supreme Court.

It is uncertain whether it would reach that level. The Selective Service System had urged Miller to reject the case, largely because the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service, appointed by Congress, is now studying the male-only registration policy.

Irrespective of the fate of the case on appeal, National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System recalls practice and precedent of another era.

The government agency relied heavily on a 1981 Supreme Court decision, Rostker v. Goldberg, that said women could be excluded from the draft because they were not 'similarly situated' with men for draft purposes. That decision highlighted the fact that women could not serve in combat.

'In the nearly four decades since Rostker, however, women's opportunities in the military have expanded dramatically,' Miller observed. 'In 2013, the Department of Defense officially lifted the ban on women in combat.'

He cited Ginsburg's majority opinions in equal rights cases since then for greater scrutiny on the military policy, the 1996 US v. Virginia and 2017 Sessions v. Morales-Santana.

'Typically, the defender of legislation that differentiates on the basis of gender must show 'at least that the challenged classification serves important governmental objectives and that the discriminatory means employed are substantially related to the achievement of those objectives.''

He acknowledged the governmental objective of raising and supporting armies but did not accept arguments that requiring women to register might affect female enlistment 'by increasing the perception that women will be forced to serve in combat roles.'

'At its core, [the Selective Service System] argument rests on the assumption that women are significantly more combat-averse than men,' Miller wrote, adding that no evidence was offered to support that claim, which he deemed 'an ancient canard' about women.

'Further, under Rostker, the dispositive issue is whether men and women are similarly situated in regard to the draft,' Miller wrote. 'Thus, the relevant question is not what proportion of women are physically eligible for combat -- it may well be that only a small percentage of women meets the physical standards for combat positions.'

But Miller added, a similarly small percentage of men may also be eligible for combat, which would offer no reason to discriminate against women.

CORRECTION: This story has been updated to correct a quote from the judge's order.

West Lafayette
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 60° Lo: 54°
Feels Like: 54°
Kokomo
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 62° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 54°
Rensselaer
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 55° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 54°
Fowler
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 55° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 54°
Williamsport
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 58° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 54°
Crawfordsville
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 61° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 54°
Frankfort
Cloudy
54° wxIcon
Hi: 62° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 54°
Delphi
Cloudy
52° wxIcon
Hi: 62° Lo: 54°
Feels Like: 52°
Monticello
Cloudy
52° wxIcon
Hi: 63° Lo: 54°
Feels Like: 52°
Logansport
Cloudy
52° wxIcon
Hi: 62° Lo: 52°
Feels Like: 52°
Cooler, gray weather with spits of rain...
WLFI Temps
WLFI Planner

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 1003647

Reported Deaths: 16423
CountyCasesDeaths
Marion1351072116
Lake661851159
Allen57674800
Hamilton46217464
St. Joseph44210611
Elkhart35807508
Vanderburgh32162480
Tippecanoe27859258
Johnson25007444
Hendricks23795357
Porter22856365
Madison18694408
Clark18505252
Vigo17393303
Monroe15218199
LaPorte15101250
Delaware15024261
Howard14681289
Kosciusko12260147
Hancock11682175
Bartholomew11548180
Warrick11270189
Floyd11059214
Wayne10946253
Grant10019219
Morgan9438176
Boone8891116
Dubois8249131
Dearborn819893
Henry8174152
Noble8003106
Marshall7891135
Cass7519121
Lawrence7433171
Shelby7171119
Jackson695889
Gibson6567115
Harrison646691
Huntington636899
Knox6360106
DeKalb628699
Montgomery6229109
Miami591498
Putnam577678
Clinton572171
Whitley563455
Steuben558976
Wabash5309103
Jasper527879
Jefferson509297
Ripley498686
Adams479775
Daviess4653114
Scott438473
Greene423596
Wells422588
Clay421360
White417364
Decatur4152102
Fayette405787
Jennings385961
Posey375844
Washington356150
LaGrange356078
Randolph343499
Spencer338743
Fountain333860
Sullivan327852
Starke315570
Owen313970
Fulton309167
Orange292663
Jay283445
Franklin265143
Perry264852
Rush260832
Carroll260633
Vermillion257254
Parke230426
Pike228443
Tipton227259
Blackford191841
Pulaski183157
Crawford159023
Newton156848
Benton150217
Brown145747
Martin138019
Switzerland134811
Warren120816
Union107016
Ohio84213
Unassigned0540

COVID-19 Important links and resources

As the spread of COVID-19, or as it's more commonly known as the coronavirus continues, this page will serve as your one-stop for the resources you need to stay informed and to keep you and your family safe. CLICK HERE

Closings related to the prevention of the COVID-19 can be found on our Closings page.

Community Events