STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Collins: I think Obamacare ruling will be overturned

In an interview with Jake Tapper, Republican Senator Susan Collins says she believes a judge's decision ruling that Obamacare is unconstitutional will be overturned on appeal.

Posted: Dec 17, 2018 4:20 PM
Updated: Dec 17, 2018 4:23 PM

The Affordable Care Act that Congress passed in 2010 was decades in the making, an effort to control rising health care costs and provide insurance to millions of Americans. The US Supreme Court twice upheld it, emphasizing that history, and the law survived countless attempts by Republicans to repeal it.

Last year, when the Republican Congress lifted an ACA tax penalty -- tied to the individual insurance requirement -- it left other coverage intact.

But in his startling Friday night ruling, US District Court Judge Reed O'Connor in Texas sized up Congress' intentions and declared that because of the tax change, the entire law must fall -- erasing the individual coverage mandate, along with expanded Medicaid, and insurance protections for people with cancer, diabetes and other pre-existing health conditions.

O'Connor's 55-page ruling, currently on hold and subject to appeal, was immediately disparaged by critics on the left and on the right and by law professors on both sides of the dispute. He selectively cited congressional history and Supreme Court justices to reach his result.

Yet prior litigation over the law dubbed Obamacare suggests seemingly far-fetched arguments can go far and roil the courts. O'Connor's decision may be reversed on an intermediate appeal, but because of the importance of the massive law, a looming question reverberated Monday: What would the Supreme Court do?

In earlier cases, the court upheld the law by one vote, in 2012, and by two votes, in 2015. And all five justices who upheld Obamacare in 2012 -- the four liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts -- remain on the bench.

"Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them," Roberts wrote in the 2015 case, after noting the ambiguity of a provision that challengers argued would invalidate the law. "If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter."

Trump on Monday tweeted that he hoped the Supreme Court would uphold the Texas ruling and end Obamacare. "A confirming Supreme Court Decision will lead to GREAT HealthCare results for Americans!" he wrote.

The President's many tweets focused on the judiciary signal a belief that his appointees would side with him. But that might not even be true with newest justice, Brett Kavanaugh. As an appeals court judge in Washington, DC, Kavanaugh declined to rule against the law as he sidestepped the merits of a dispute on procedural grounds.

Trump v Roberts

Roberts has also recently demonstrated a greater interest in shielding the high court from Washington's partisanship, most visibly in his November rebuke of Trump for labeling a jurist an "Obama judge."

"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts wrote in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

And Trump knows that a Roberts vote against Obamacare is no sure thing.

While he was a presidential candidate, Trump in 2016 called Roberts a "nightmare for conservatives" in an interview on ABC. "Justice Roberts could've killed Obamacare and should've, based on everything -- should've killed it twice," Trump said.

And in 2012, Trump tweeted: "Congratulations to John Roberts for making Americans hate the Supreme Court because of his BS."

Still, a new Supreme Court test is not imminent.

Because of the normal progression of appeals, the justices are unlikely to rule on the current case before 2020. The justices are about a month short of setting their full 2018-19 argument calendar.

RELATED: 2019 is the year the Supreme Court will make or break Trump

How the court previously upheld Obamacare

On March 23, 2010, when President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act, several Republican- led states were ready to launch a lawsuit challenging the centerpiece requirement of the law that forces all Americans to buy health insurance. By a 5-4 vote in 2012, the justices upheld that provision.

The high court -- in a hard fought, divisive opinion written by Roberts -- rejected the Obama administration's justifications based on Congress' power to regulate interstate activity but rather said that the individual mandate could be upheld on the taxing power. The law included a penalty (for those who refused to buy insurance) to be collected by the Internal Revenue Service with annual tax filings.

Roberts was joined in that opinion by the court's four liberal justices, although they would have upheld the law on Congress' commerce power. The four dissenting justices, all conservatives, rejected all legal grounds.

A separate, narrower challenge in 2015 came down to a 6-3 vote, with then-Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had dissented in 2012, joining the majority view upholding the challenged portion of the law. Kavanaugh succeeded Kennedy in October.

The current dispute, brought by Texas and 19 other Republican-led states, tests whether Congress' 2017 removal of the tax means the individual mandate cannot be enforced. (That new insurance requirement flowed from Congress' goal of universal coverage and the notion that as more people bought insurance the overall cost of premiums would be lower.)

The state challengers also boldly declared that if the insurance requirement fell, the entire law was doomed.

Ruling on the eve of the 2019 insurance enrollment deadline, O'Connor agreed. He discarded the traditional court principle that judges should respect portions of legislation not deemed unconstitutional.

To justify his decision striking down everything, he pointed to lines in the 2010 law describing the individual mandate as "essential" and to statements of Supreme Court justices emphasizing the importance of the mandate to the entire law.

But in both situations, Congress and the justices were, in a practical vein, speaking more to the workability of the law, not the overall legal validity, and focused only on 2010, not the 2017 tax revision.

O'Connor, a 2007 appointee of President George W. Bush, stated at the outset of his opinion that he was not tasked with "policymaking." Yet his approach deemed irrelevant that when Congress removed the tax penalty in 2017, it did not change the individual mandate and did not amend the rest of the Affordable Care Act.

Not even the Trump administration had argued that the entire law should be thrown out, though it sided with the states against the individual mandate.

If justices follow their precedent, it is likely that most, if not all, of Obama's signature domestic achievement would endure.

West Lafayette
78° wxIcon
Hi: 87° Lo: 65°
Feels Like: 80°
Kokomo
Overcast
75° wxIcon
Hi: 82° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 75°
Rensselaer
Broken Clouds
75° wxIcon
Hi: 82° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 75°
Fowler
Broken Clouds
75° wxIcon
Hi: 84° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 75°
Williamsport
Broken Clouds
80° wxIcon
Hi: 87° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 83°
Crawfordsville
Overcast
73° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 73°
Frankfort
Overcast
80° wxIcon
Hi: 84° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 83°
Delphi
Overcast
73° wxIcon
Hi: 85° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 73°
Monticello
Overcast
73° wxIcon
Hi: 83° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 73°
Logansport
Overcast
72° wxIcon
Hi: 83° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 72°
WLFI Radar
WLFI Temps
WLFI Planner

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 49575

Reported Deaths: 2739
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Marion11812690
Lake5337247
Elkhart343257
Allen2867133
St. Joseph202569
Cass16439
Hamilton1629101
Hendricks1439100
Johnson1306118
Porter78038
Tippecanoe7439
Clark67144
Madison66864
Vanderburgh6296
LaPorte59727
Bartholomew59245
Howard58258
Kosciusko5654
Marshall5217
Noble49128
LaGrange4829
Jackson4773
Delaware46052
Boone45944
Hancock45736
Shelby43425
Floyd39144
Morgan32831
Monroe31528
Grant30226
Montgomery29720
Henry29316
Dubois2906
Clinton2882
White26810
Decatur25532
Lawrence25125
Dearborn24723
Vigo2408
Warrick23229
Harrison21722
Greene19132
Miami1892
Jennings17912
Putnam1708
DeKalb1634
Scott1628
Daviess15017
Wayne1496
Perry1409
Orange13623
Steuben1332
Franklin1278
Jasper1252
Ripley1247
Wabash1152
Carroll1122
Fayette1037
Gibson1032
Newton9910
Whitley995
Starke963
Huntington822
Randolph804
Wells791
Jefferson782
Fulton731
Jay680
Washington671
Pulaski661
Knox650
Clay644
Rush603
Owen511
Adams491
Posey490
Benton480
Spencer461
Sullivan451
Brown421
Blackford392
Fountain332
Crawford320
Tipton311
Switzerland280
Parke240
Martin220
Ohio210
Vermillion170
Warren151
Union130
Pike110
Unassigned0193

COVID-19 Important links and resources

As the spread of COVID-19, or as it's more commonly known as the coronavirus continues, this page will serve as your one-stop for the resources you need to stay informed and to keep you and your family safe. CLICK HERE

Closings related to the prevention of the COVID-19 can be found on our Closings page.

Community Events