SEVERE WX : Flood Warning View Alerts
STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Texas judge says he'll likely kill DACA -- but not yet

A federal judge on Friday hinted he will likely invalidate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals progra...

Posted: Sep 1, 2018 4:14 PM
Updated: Sep 1, 2018 4:14 PM

A federal judge on Friday hinted he will likely invalidate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in the future -- but for now the program can continue to operate.

The ruling was an unexpected, albeit temporary, reprieve for the program, which President Donald Trump opted to end almost exactly a year ago.

Continents and regions

DACA and Dream Act

Deportation

Immigration

Immigration, citizenship and displacement

International relations and national security

North America

Southwestern United States

Texas

The Americas

Undocumented immigrants

United States

Texas-based District Judge Andrew Hanen wrote Friday that he believes DACA is likely illegal and ultimately will fail to survive a challenge before his court. DACA is an Obama-era program that protects young undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children from deportation.

But despite that -- and despite finding that the continuation of DACA could harm the eight states and two governors who challenged the program -- Hanen decided not to issue a ruling that would have immediately blocked DACA's continuation.

Since Trump sought to end DACA last September, the program's future has been in doubt. Members of Congress largely say they want to preserve the program legislatively, but have failed to pass anything in two opportunities to do so. In the meantime, three federal courts have sustained the program.

While Hanen rebuffed the red states' request to end DACA immediately, his inclination to invalidate the program eventually contributes to what experts expect to be a fast track to the Supreme Court in the coming year.

Hanen said that there were two issues that required him to deny the request to immediately halt the program: One was timeliness. He found that because Texas and its coalition of states waited more than five years after the implementation of DACA, even as it challenged a related program, to file this suit, that it lost some of its ability to claim damages were immediately harmful and thus required an immediate response.

In addition, Hanen ruled that though the states could prove they were harmed by the continuation of DACA, mainly in costs of benefits to recipients, the potential consequences of ending DACA immediately were more harmful.

Three federal judges have blocked the administration from ending DACA as it tried to do last September, ordering the Department of Homeland Security to continue renewing permits under the program.

But Hanen was widely expected to be unfavorable to DACA, as he had previously prevented a similar, expanded program from ever going into effect under the Obama administration.

The new case challenging the DACA program, instituted in 2012, drew heavily from that decision Hanen made on the 2014 expansion of the program and creation of a similar program for undocumented parents of Americans.

Hanen said in his Friday ruling that he largely agreed, and DACA was likely to be illegal under the same reasoning as that expansion.

But one major difference prevented him from immediately halting the program -- the fact that it was already in effect.

"Here, the egg has been scrambled," Hanen wrote. "To try to put it back in the shell with only a preliminary injunction record, and perhaps at great risk to many, does not make sense nor serve the best interests of this country."

But in his 117-page decision, Hanen was clear that he did not intend his ruling to be interpreted as good news for the future of DACA, at least long term.

He said the popularity of the program was not relevant to whether it had been legally created -- the crux of the challenge to it.

"DACA is a popular program and one that Conress should consider saving," Hanen wrote. Nevertheless, "this court will not succumb to the temptation to set aside legal principles and to substitute its judgment in lieu of legislative action. If the nation truly wants to have a DACA program, it is up to Congress to say so."

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the challenge to DACA, hailed the ruling in a statement, despite it being an interim loss in court.

"We're now very confident that DACA will soon meet the same fate as the Obama-era Deferred Action for Parents of Americans program, which the courts blocked after I led another state coalition challenging its constitutionality," Paxton said. "Our lawsuit is vital to restoring the rule of law to our nation's immigration system."

Hanen's ruling Friday defuses the threat to DACA for some time. In a separate order, Hanen took the unusual step of making it possible to appeal his denial of an immediate halt to the program, and gave the parties three weeks to figure out next steps before the case moves to its next phase.

The Department of Justice declined to defend DACA in the lawsuit, but did ask Hanen to limit the effect of any ruling he may have issued.

Spokesman Devin O'Malley said in a statement that Hanen had agreed DACA is unlawful, "as the Justice Department has consistently argued," and said the department was "pleased" with the decision.

In the administration's stead, DACA was defended by the pro-immigrant advocacy and legal organization MALDEF and the state of New Jersey.

In a statement Friday, MALDEF hailed the ruling but noted it still believes DACA to be legal.

"While MALDEF continues to disagree adamantly with the judge's views on the legality of DACA under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), and on whether the state of Texas even has standing -- as required by the Constitution -- to challenge DACA, today's court decision appropriately leaves DACA in place with respect to over 100,000 Texans and hundreds of thousands of others nationwide," said Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF.

This story has been updated.

Lafayette
Clear
27° wxIcon
Hi: 50° Lo: 25°
Feels Like: 27°
Kokomo
Clear
21° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 22°
Feels Like: 21°
Rensselaer
Clear
21° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 22°
Feels Like: 21°
Lafayette
Clear
27° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 23°
Feels Like: 27°
Danville
Clear
25° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 25°
Feels Like: 18°
Frankfort
Clear
23° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 23°
Feels Like: 15°
Frankfort
Partly Cloudy
23° wxIcon
Hi: 46° Lo: 23°
Feels Like: 15°
Monticello
Clear
21° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 23°
Feels Like: 21°
Monticello
Clear
21° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 23°
Feels Like: 21°
Logansport
Clear
21° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 22°
Feels Like: 21°
Dry, mild conditions continue
WLFI Radar
WLFI Temps
WLFI Planner

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 663511

Reported Deaths: 12633
CountyCasesDeaths
Marion908511647
Lake48510882
Allen35951638
Hamilton32138398
St. Joseph30096513
Elkhart25423417
Vanderburgh21283379
Tippecanoe20096203
Johnson16380360
Porter16009272
Hendricks15855300
Clark11999181
Madison11764319
Vigo11636230
Monroe10363163
Delaware9854179
LaPorte9790197
Howard9075198
Kosciusko8574111
Bartholomew7479147
Warrick7430151
Hancock7418132
Floyd7226170
Wayne6645192
Grant6437157
Boone610389
Morgan6103125
Dubois5923111
Dearborn549068
Cass545899
Marshall5432105
Henry542593
Noble510178
Jackson465167
Shelby461490
Lawrence4189113
Gibson401781
Harrison401064
Clinton396553
Montgomery388483
DeKalb386478
Miami357663
Knox357585
Whitley349837
Huntington346277
Steuben339255
Wabash332376
Putnam331159
Ripley327762
Adams323949
Jasper317043
White297452
Jefferson295474
Daviess285596
Fayette271956
Decatur271088
Greene261680
Posey261431
Wells258575
Scott251250
Clay241544
LaGrange241270
Randolph225576
Spencer218030
Jennings215744
Washington212127
Sullivan203639
Fountain201842
Starke188451
Owen182853
Fulton179337
Jay178328
Carroll176519
Perry173435
Orange171150
Rush165322
Vermillion160842
Franklin159535
Tipton146841
Parke139416
Pike127833
Blackford120727
Pulaski106744
Newton96632
Brown95139
Benton92213
Crawford91013
Martin80214
Warren75814
Switzerland7558
Union67310
Ohio53911
Unassigned0433

COVID-19 Important links and resources

As the spread of COVID-19, or as it's more commonly known as the coronavirus continues, this page will serve as your one-stop for the resources you need to stay informed and to keep you and your family safe. CLICK HERE

Closings related to the prevention of the COVID-19 can be found on our Closings page.

Community Events