NEW YORK (AP) — Mila Kunis' stardom went up a notch last week, and you would think it's …
In this May 16, 2012 photo, the Facebook logo is displayed on an iPad in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
In this May 16, 2012 photo, the Facebook logo is displayed on an iPad in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
NEW YORK (AP) — Mila Kunis' stardom went up a notch last week, and you would think it's …
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google will pay a $7 million fine to settle a multistate …
BERLIN (AP) — The European Space Agency says it has received the first location fix from …
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut will receive more than $500,000 from Google Inc. as …
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit brought by an …
Updated: Wednesday, 08 Aug 2012, 12:35 PM EDT
Published : Wednesday, 08 Aug 2012, 10:46 AM EDT
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — Attorneys for Facebook and the American Civil Liberties Union want a federal appeals court to rule that clicking "Like" on the social networking site is constitutionally-protected free speech.
The case revolves around six employees who were fired by Hampton Sheriff B.J. Roberts after they supported his re-election opponent in 2009. One of those workers, Daniel Ray Carter, had "liked" the Facebook page of Roberts' opponent.
Facebook said clicking 'Like' was the 21st century-equivalent of a campaign yard sign.
"If Carter had stood on a street corner and announced, 'I like Jim Adams for Hampton sheriff,' there would be no dispute that his statement was constitutionally protected speech," the company wrote in a friend of the court brief filed with the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. "Carter made that very statement; the fact that he did it online, with a click of a computer's mouse, does not deprive Carter's speech of constitutional protection."
U.S. District Judge Raymond Jackson ruled against the workers in April, saying merely 'liking' a Facebook page was insufficient speech to merit constitutional protection.
"In cases where courts have found that constitutional speech protections extended to Facebook posts, actual statements existed within the record," Raymond wrote.
Facebook and the ACLU want the appeals court to vacate the judge's decision. The ACLU also is advocating on behalf of the other fired workers who did not click 'Like' but who are also appealing.
Roberts said some of the workers were let go because he wanted to replace them with sworn deputies while others were fired because of poor performance or his belief that their actions "hindered the harmony and efficiency of the office."
The ACLU argued that doesn't outweigh the employees' rights.
"It is binding First Amendment law that irrespective of an employee's position, a public employer cannot terminate him or her for speech on a matter of public concern unrelated to his or her job duties," the group wrote.
Comments WLFI.com is migrating to a more stable commenting system called DISQUS. This system is used by CNN, TIME, FOX News, numerous blogging sites and has over 75 Million registered users. Unfortunately we can't migrate our current user accounts to this new system.
To sign up for a DISQUS account, click the DISQUS button just below and to the right and then click Login.
DISQUS lets you login with several different options, including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yahoo or OpenID. We expect it to allow more conversation and better moderation. If you have any questions, please feel free to comment below.